🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day went somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year went for Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.